Add object filter ratio (#2952)

* Add object ratio config parameters

Issue: #2948

* Add config test for object filter ratios

Issue: #2948

* Address review comments

- Accept `ratio` default
- Rename `bounds` to `box` for consistency
- Add migration for new field

Issue: #2948

* Fix logical errors

- field migrations require default values
- `clipped` referenced the wrong index for region, since it shifted
- missed an inclusion of `ratio` for detections in `process_frames`
- revert naming `o[2]` as `box` since it is out of scope!

This has now been test-run against a video, so I believe the kinks are
worked out.

Issue: #2948

* Update contributing notes for `make`

Issue: #2948

* Fix migration

- Ensure that defaults match between Event and migration script
- Deconflict migration script number (from rebase)

Issue: #2948

* Filter objects out of ratio bounds

Issue: #2948

* Update migration file to 009

Issue: #2948
This commit is contained in:
Nick
2022-04-10 09:25:18 -04:00
committed by GitHub
parent 923d07b1a4
commit 045aac8933
13 changed files with 138 additions and 14 deletions

View File

@@ -192,6 +192,7 @@ class TrackedObject:
"score": self.obj_data["score"],
"box": self.obj_data["box"],
"area": self.obj_data["area"],
"ratio": self.obj_data["ratio"],
"region": self.obj_data["region"],
"stationary": self.obj_data["motionless_count"]
> self.camera_config.detect.stationary.threshold,
@@ -341,6 +342,14 @@ def zone_filtered(obj: TrackedObject, object_config):
if obj_settings.threshold > obj.computed_score:
return True
# if the object is not proportionally wide enough
if obj_settings.min_ratio > obj.obj_data["ratio"]:
return True
# if the object is proportionally too wide
if obj_settings.max_ratio < obj.obj_data["ratio"]:
return True
return False